On July 5, 2020, the bulk carrier Atlantic Huron was approaching the Soo Locks (Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan) when the crew ordered astern to slow the vessel. Instead, the ship’s propulsion system experienced a failure that caused it to move ahead with increasing speed, ultimately resulting in a $2.2 million accident.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) traced the event back to a deceptively small component: a set screw in the vessel’s controllable pitch propeller (CPP) pitch-control mechanism. According to the NTSB, the set screw backed out and post-accident examination found no evidence of manufacturer-required thread-locking fluid—a detail that set off a chain of mechanical failures.
This is exactly the type of high-consequence scenario where fastener selection, installation discipline, and retention strategy matter—and where companies like Sesco Precision, as a supplier of industrial screws and set screws, can help customers reduce risk by specifying the right retention approach for the application.
What the NTSB Found: How a Set Screw Failure Became a Propulsion Control Failure
In a CPP system, blade pitch changes direction and speed. The NTSB report explains that a set screw intended to secure a locking pin in the feedback mechanism backed out, allowing the locking pin to also back out and damage components inside the oil distribution (OD) box.
Two key details from the investigation stand out:
- The original equipment manufacturer required thread-locking fluid when installing the set screw (to prevent it from backing out).
- Technicians found no evidence that thread-locking fluid had been applied the last time the set screw was removed and reinstalled (maintenance records indicated that work occurred years prior).
The result wasn’t just a loose screw—it was a system-level failure where the vessel could command astern while propulsion behavior effectively went the opposite direction, complicating decision-making on the bridge.
The Real Lesson: Fasteners Don’t “Fail” in Isolation—Processes Do
Most maintenance teams understand torque values, locking compounds, and best practices. The challenge is consistency—especially across:
- Shipyard periods with many trades touching the same equipment.
- Time gaps measured in years between disassembly and “the day it matters.”
- Vibration, thermal cycling, and oil exposure that can degrade retention over time.
The NTSB’s probable cause statement points directly to not following the manufacturer’s requirement to use thread-locking fluid during installation.
That framing is important: in high-consequence systems, installation method is part of the design.
Where Set Screw Retention Commonly Breaks Down
Here are the most common “failure pathways” seen across industrial and marine environments:
1) Threadlocker is specified—but not applied (or applied incorrectly)
Threadlocker is process-sensitive: surface condition, oil contamination, cure time, and correct grade all matter. If it’s skipped—or applied to contaminated threads—it may not perform as intended.
2) The application needs more than one retention method
Some assemblies benefit from redundancy: mechanical locking + chemical locking, witness marking + inspection intervals, etc. (Always align to OEM guidance and class requirements.)
3) Procurement substitutes “equivalent” fasteners without an equivalent retention strategy
A set screw can match thread size and material and still be wrong if it lacks the retention feature the design assumed (patches, pellets, locking elements, point style, etc.).
How Sesco Precision Can Help Reduce Risk with the Right Set Screw Options
Sesco Precision (as a fastener supplier) can support customers by providing set screws and retention-ready configurations that align with demanding applications—especially when the maintenance reality is “high vibration + limited access + long intervals.”
Examples of retention strategies that are commonly used to help resist loosening (application-dependent):
Pre-applied locking features
- Pre-applied threadlocker coatings/patches (helps standardize application and reduce “missed step” risk in the field).
- Nylon pellet / nylon patch style locking (prevailing torque style retention).
Point style and engagement considerations
- Cup, cone, dog, and flat points each behave differently in how they bite/seat and how they resist motion under load and vibration.
- Matching point style to the mating surface can improve holding performance and reduce fretting.
Material and corrosion compatibility
In marine environments, galvanic corrosion and material compatibility matter. The “right” screw is not only about strength, but also about how it behaves over time in the actual service environment.
Important note: No supplier can honestly promise a single product would have prevented a specific accident—because prevention depends on correct specification, installation, verification, and maintenance practices. But selecting retention-ready fasteners and standardizing the locking method can materially reduce the probability of loosening-related issues in many real-world applications.
A Practical Prevention Checklist for CPP and Other Mission-Critical Mechanisms
If you want a simple, field-usable way to turn this lesson into action:
- Treat threadlocker as a controlled step: Confirm the OEM requirement, specify the product/grade, and define surface prep.
- Standardize the fastener + retention method: Reduce “tribal knowledge.” Use controlled part numbers and kitting where possible.
- Add verification, not just installation: Witness marks, torque stripe, second-person check, or sign-off steps for critical assemblies.
- Document what was used: Not just “installed,” but “installed with ____ threadlocker / ____ locking feature.”
- Source the right fastener the first time: Work with suppliers like Sesco Precision to ensure the screw, locking method, material, and point style match the application.
Small Parts, Big Consequences
The Atlantic Huron accident is a sharp reminder that a low-cost fastener can sit upstream of multi-million-dollar consequences when it’s part of a control mechanism. The NTSB’s findings reinforce a truth every maintenance and reliability team already knows—until they’re forced to relearn it:
In critical systems, fasteners are not “hardware.” They’re engineered risk controls.
If you’re reviewing your own propulsion control mechanisms, steering systems, or other safety-critical assemblies, Sesco Precision can be positioned not just as a seller of screws—but as a supplier that helps you spec the correct set screw and retention strategy so “small” never becomes “catastrophic.”